![]() |
Royal Dutch/Shell 'Oil Reserves' Controversy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9708d/9708d90c5c6d9b91e70d3b85102ebddc9ae8d690" alt="Case Details"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eee6c/eee6cee738f127cedef1d6bb99e27fd408876feb" alt="Case Introduction 1"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14bd8/14bd8fc851975db454eefd0fd4e7da345f29f159" alt="Case Introduction 2"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fed51/fed5196c23e4dd2565c10a4793033387036dd6bb" alt="Case Excerpts"
Abstract
Issuess
The case is structured to achieve the following teaching objectives:
- Unethical Business Practices
Contents |
The Announcement |
Background Note |
The Revelation |
The Controversy |
The Aftermath |
Lessons from the Saga |
Exhibits |
Keywords
Michael Lynch,Robert Plummer,Marcus Samuel,Philip Watts,aggressive,optimistic ,Royal Dutch/Shell, Oil Reserves Controversy, Philip Watts Walter Van de Vijver, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), SEC Definitions for Proved Oil Reserves, Reserve Replacement Ratio, Reserves Recategorization Corporate Governance, Business Ethics